File #: CONS 16-314   
Section: Consent Status: Agenda Ready
Meeting Body: City Council
Agenda Date: 6/21/2016 Final action:
Subject: Gann Appropriations Limit for FY 2017
Attachments: 1. Attachment I Resolution, 2. Attachment II GANN Summary
DATE: June 21, 2016

TO: Mayor and City Council

FROM: Director of Finance

SUBJECT
Title

Gann Appropriations Limit for FY 2017

End
RECOMMENDATION
Recommendation

That City Council adopts a Resolution establishing an appropriations limit for Fiscal Year 2017.

Body
BACKGROUND

State Proposition 4, commonly known as the Gann Initiative, was approved by California voters in November 1979. Proposition 4 created Article XIIIB of the State Constitution, which places limits on the amount of revenue that can be spent by government agencies. This is referred to as the Gann Appropriation Limit, or Gann Limit.

A subsequent related State initiative, Proposition 111, was approved by the voters in June 1990 and provided new adjustment formulas to make the Gann Limit more responsive to local growth issues and to address concerns regarding the accountability of local governments in adopting their limits. Prior to each fiscal year, city councils must adopt by resolution the Gann Appropriation Limit for the city for the upcoming year. In addition, cities are required to conduct a review of their limits during annual financial audits.

The appropriations limitation imposed by Propositions 4 and 111 creates a restriction on the amount of revenue that can be appropriated in any fiscal year. The limit is based on actual appropriations during the 1978-79 fiscal year and is increased each year using population and inflation growth factors. Only revenues that are classified as "proceeds of taxes" are subject to the limit. The use of "non-tax proceeds" (user fees, rental income, franchise fees, Gas Tax revenue) is not restricted by the Gann limit.

DISCUSSION

During any fiscal year, a city may not appropriate any proceeds of taxes it receives in excess of its established limit. Excess funds received in any year may be carried into the subsequent year for use if the city is below its limit for that year. Any excess funds remaining after the second year would...

Click here for full text